North America

USA - New York

New York
New York
275 Seventh Ave, Suite 706
New York, NY 10001
P: +1.646.722.3041

USA - Detroit/ Ann Arbor

Ann Arbor / Detroit
Ann Arbor/ Detroit
309 Maynard Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48104
+1 734 913 0348



Frankfurt / Mainz
Kaiserstrasse 22-24
55116 Mainz
+49 6131 2180 0

United Kingdom

58 St. Aldates
Oxford, OX1 1ST
+44 1865 324 911


Badenerstraße 549
8048 Zurich
+41 43 210 97 46

South America


Sao Paulo
Av. Roque Petroni Júnior, 1089
São Paulo, SP Brasil – 04707-900
+55 11 3033 5858

Asia Pacific


Rm.306, Bldg. 2
Lujiazui Software Park No. 100, Lane 91, E'shan Rd. Pudong Shanghai 200127, China
+86 21 6859 2099


Office no. 3, 14th floor German Center
Building No. 9B -DLF Cyber City
Phase-III Gurgaon - INDIA
+91 124 463 6045

What is Wrong with PR?

Posted On March 26, 2018

By Jennifer Sanchis

This is probably PR’s greatest irony: PR suffers from bad reputation and image issues. Although the discipline has been institutionalised for years now, the industry is still facing an existential crisis that most practitioners and professional bodies are actively tackling. I wanted to look at the most crucial challenges and misconceptions which, according to me, are at the epicentre of “the PR problem”.

PR shouldn’t be another one-way communication channel that organisations use to serve their own interests

First published in 1999, the visionary authors of the highly impactful Cluetrain Manifesto were merciless when talking about PR’s credibility issue:

“Everyone – including many PR people – senses that something is deeply phony about the profession […]. Take the standard computer-industry press release. With few exception, it describes an “announcement” that was not made, for a product that was not available, quoting people who never said anything, for distribution to a list of people who mostly consider it trash.”

One of the greatest aspects that differentiate us from advertising and marketing is that our ultimate goal is to represent the interests of an organisation’s stakeholders. Interestingly, the same authors also suggested that “the best of the people in PR are not PR types at all. They understand they aren’t censors, they’re the company’s best conversationalists.”

The marketing mind-set, which became popular in the mid-1990s, embodied the linear process of myopic, short-sighed and tactical product-orientated campaigns. Moreover, corporate branding was a case of understanding ‘who we are’ and ‘what we stand for’, and, as a sense giver, sending the message out there.

Meanwhile, PR grew in acceptance while promoting a more strategic, cross-functional and holistic approach. I find that a lot of practitioners today can be too focused on their own brand rather than understanding their key players’ interest.

PR is too “risk averse”

This is another weakness that PR practitioners need to address. In #FuturePRoof, Matthew Hopkins, Chief Executive of Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, made an interesting observation:

“I sometimes observe organisations, especially in the NHS, not having the conversations publicly that they need to because they are too focused on reputation management rather than driving improvement. We need to move beyond that and have the conversations that count.”

Let’s not be scared of the noise. Many voices should participate in the shaping of an organisation’s mission and vision in order to grow and improve. Corporate messaging should be part of a dynamic process, so let’s be more transparent and open!

PR must move away from impersonal communication

“[Organisations] will only sound human when they empower real human beings to speak on their behalf.” Cluetrain Manifesto

As we embody organisations and brands, let’s not forget that we are, first, all human, operating in environments filled with people, to serve other people. Typically, organisations build their communication using phrases such as ‘a spokesperson said’, or ‘a representative communicated that’. Impersonal tone makes it hard for the public to relate to a statement.

Instead, some leaders in the industry are advocating the case for plain language in spoken and written communication, whilst also helping leaders express themselves with empathy and humanise their vocabulary more generally. Moreover, whilst language and tone is crucial, granting attention to names other than the CEO’s help humanise communication and restore PR’s sacred role towards people. As Stephen Waddington, Chief Engagement Officer at Ketchum, wrote: “Companies need to lighten up and take themselves less seriously. They need to get a sense of humour.”

We should seek to understand how PR is being done in practice as opposed to in theory, whilst asking ourselves what our organisation’s goals are and how we plan to work towards them. Whilst it might be true that PR has become discredited by the general public and many journalists, the industry is increasingly valued by the public as well as by private and third sector brands. So, if your answers are not the ones you had expected, let’s gather, discuss and work together to help reshape the image of PR.

This article was original posted to Jennifer Sanchis is a Senior Account Executive at PRIME Research.

Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInEmail this to someone
Share this to social

You may also be interested in


THE IMPACT OF NATIONAL CULTURE ON THE SALIENCE OF CSR DIMENSIONS IN INTERNATIONAL MEDIA COVERAGE Last summer, I spent six weeks doing media research in Ann Arbor, Michigan as the 2017 winner of the Grunig PRIME Research Fellowship. PRIME’s global scope, diverse international team, and its worldwide client base made the company an ideal place for me to be. At the end of my experience, I wrote a paper to remind international PR professionals that concepts habitually referenced on an everyday basis are the products of social construction and, therefore, meanings may vary from one society to another. Specifically, the study concerned corporate social responsibility and its aspects in international media coverage. For the full paper please visit here: Salience of_CSR (PDF). The meaning of ...

Learn more

Mark Weiner Offers Five-Point Plan For “The Datacentric Communicator.”

Mark Weiner, Chief Executive Officer of PRIME Research Americas, posts at the Institute for Public Relations (2/27) under the headline “Advice For The Datacentric Communicator.” Weiner focuses on a five-point plan for “the evolved communicator” to shift from gathering mounds of data to generating actionable insights for their organization. His five suggestions include the understanding that algorithms and technology do some of the heavy lifting on data, but explains how “humans drive understanding, interpretive analysis and strategy.” Weiner also suggests moving from “response-driven research” to “inquiry-based research” that “starts by posing questions, problems or scenarios rather than simply representing the conventional wisdom or the facts as we already know them.” Weiner also ...

Learn more

Cision + Prime Research: Insights That Drive Business Strategies

Recently, I sat down with Kevin Akeroyd, the CEO of Cision®, and Dr. Rainer Mathes, the president and co-founder of Prime Research, to discuss Cision’s recent acquisition of Prime Research and what it means for existing and future customers. In this video, Akeroyd, and Dr. Mathes explain how the marriage of these two companies will bring about one integrated services organization, and one integrated tech platform that does media measurement, monitoring, distribution and database extremely well. If you’re interested in learning more about how Cision and Prime Research will work together to change the future of communications, view the video, or read the transcript below. Chris Lynch: Hello with Cision, and our customers, our employees, our partners, my name is Chris Lynch; ...

Learn more