North America

USA - New York

New York
New York
275 Seventh Ave, Suite 706
New York, NY 10001
P: +1.646.722.3041

USA - Detroit/ Ann Arbor

Ann Arbor / Detroit
Ann Arbor/ Detroit
309 Maynard Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48104
+1 734 913 0348



Frankfurt / Mainz
Kaiserstrasse 22-24
55116 Mainz
+49 6131 2180 0

United Kingdom

58 St. Aldates
Oxford, OX1 1ST
+44 1865 324 911


Badenerstraße 549
8048 Zurich
+41 43 210 97 46

South America


Sao Paulo
Av. Roque Petroni Júnior, 1089
São Paulo, SP Brasil – 04707-900
+55 11 3033 5858

Asia Pacific


Rm.306, Bldg. 2
Lujiazui Software Park No. 100, Lane 91, E'shan Rd. Pudong Shanghai 200127, China
+86 21 6859 2099


Office no. 3, 14th floor German Center
Building No. 9B -DLF Cyber City
Phase-III Gurgaon - INDIA
+91 124 463 6045

How to Maximize the Value of Forward-Looking PR Measurement

Posted On January 08, 2018

by Jim Simon

In October, 2017, John Gilfeather, president of John Gilfeather & Associates, weighed in on the pages of PR News about the difficulties PR agencies and in-house departments face in attempting to measure the effectiveness of their efforts (“Mobster”).

In his essay, Gilfeather states most PR pros cannot honestly cite analytics/big data as a core skillset. If they seek to hire a research partner to do the job, they can be confused by the offerings of a plethora of measurement firms all claiming to be superior. There are, of course, budget constraints. For some there may also be a sense of trepidation, i.e. “We may find out we’re not doing as well as we thought.”

Allyson Hugley, President of Measurement and Analytics for Weber Shandwick, also expanded upon the pain points of PR measurement, indicating there has been too much talk and too little action. “The industry continues to discuss data evolution conceptually — as a thought-leadership topic — rather than pushing aggressively for a real, industry-wide data transformation,” Hugley wrote.

We can all agree that PR measurement is not only about numbers and tone anymore. And it’s not about trying to measure the absolute success or failure of a program.

Today, measurement is truly about how organizations can use accurate and insightful data to influence business decisions and develop more strategic guidance. There are many aspects within the realm of data measurement and its relationship to business success, and thinking differently and strategically about measurement is critical to validating the value of public relations and the research itself.

What are today’s forward-looking organizations doing to surmount barriers to effective measurement? What results can be expected when organizations make the shift to truly strategic measurement? The following points have emerged from discussions I’ve had with industry colleagues who noted examples of how they derived strategic, actionable insights from the measurement of PR.

  • Leverage the value of CSR. As strategic business people know, investment in corporate social responsibility (CSR) amounts to far more than “feel good” activities; it delivers ROI. According to research from Cone Communications, nearly 90% of Americans will purchase a product because a company advocates for an issue they care about, and three-quarters will refuse to buy from a company if the company supports an issue contrary to their beliefs. Case in point: A leading financial services organization sought to measure the impact of its national and regional CSR campaigns, including its “share of voice” metric, i.e. how much positive and negative coverage it’s garnering on this topic versus its top 10 competitors.
    The company established a baseline for measurement and, after just one quarter, saw a positive share of voice increase of more than 15 percent. A veteran executive quickly concluded the results were so strong the team should undertake similar efforts to boost other brand drivers not associated with CSR.
  • Ask the right questions during a crisis. Given the intense focus on their industry group, technology companies sometimes weather sudden, powerful crises that can quickly threaten to undermine their reputations. One company recently dealt with a product-related crisis which resembled a similar situation a year before. The communications staff analyzed data from the prior year to answer a number of important questions: How often did we respond to inquiries about the product situation? Are the same authors and outlets telling this story? What can the social sharing from back then tell us about what we’re dealing with now?
    After collecting and assessing the data, the company positioned itself to make smarter decisions. It opted to increase the frequency of its responses to inquiries, for instance, to shorten the news cycle. Thus, the volume of social sharing – which, in this case, would be largely negative – was sharply reduced, along with the time window for sharing.
  • Improve the effectiveness of events. Another case involved a communications team that staged an annual event in Asia for years. A competitor had also been running a similar event there around the same time and had recently dominated the share of voice in U.S.-based media. Knowing they had to improve event execution, the communications team compared year-over-year data for both events to accurately compare the coverage as well as discussions surrounding related topics and subtopics, including the tone. Because they had this data, the company could look back at specific pieces of information that could help them uncover different influencers, new topics, etc. Armed with this data, the team developed a strategic plan to more proactively connect to the influencers, authors and outlets which could make the most positive impact well ahead of the next year’s event.

These examples are the tip of the iceberg in knowing how to develop and maximize strategic media measurement data. For example, you can detect if a prominent journalist is covering your brand constantly, or only intermittently, or if your target audiences are talking about you or your competitors and what they are saying. You can understand what level of influence social media has on traditional media, and if certain topics play better in different social platforms. Developing this type of information often requires a shift in thinking. Basic media metrics often prove to be irrelevant in the context of broader business operations. However, by focusing on business goals and measuring against them proactively, communicators can adapt their media strategies to enable more strategic results.

About the Author

Jim Simon is a former chief communications officer (CCO) of several Fortune 500 corporations and is a current trustee of the Institute for Public Relations and member of the IPR Measurement Commission. He serves as a consultant to CCOs and CMOs in several industry groups and authors a regular column for the Columbus (Ohio) Dispatch/GateHouse Media. He also guest lectures at universities and colleges.

Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInEmail this to someone
Share this to social

You may also be interested in


THE IMPACT OF NATIONAL CULTURE ON THE SALIENCE OF CSR DIMENSIONS IN INTERNATIONAL MEDIA COVERAGE Last summer, I spent six weeks doing media research in Ann Arbor, Michigan as the 2017 winner of the Grunig PRIME Research Fellowship. PRIME’s global scope, diverse international team, and its worldwide client base made the company an ideal place for me to be. At the end of my experience, I wrote a paper to remind international PR professionals that concepts habitually referenced on an everyday basis are the products of social construction and, therefore, meanings may vary from one society to another. Specifically, the study concerned corporate social responsibility and its aspects in international media coverage. For the full paper please visit here: Salience of_CSR (PDF). The meaning of ...

Learn more

Mark Weiner Offers Five-Point Plan For “The Datacentric Communicator.”

Mark Weiner, Chief Executive Officer of PRIME Research Americas, posts at the Institute for Public Relations (2/27) under the headline “Advice For The Datacentric Communicator.” Weiner focuses on a five-point plan for “the evolved communicator” to shift from gathering mounds of data to generating actionable insights for their organization. His five suggestions include the understanding that algorithms and technology do some of the heavy lifting on data, but explains how “humans drive understanding, interpretive analysis and strategy.” Weiner also suggests moving from “response-driven research” to “inquiry-based research” that “starts by posing questions, problems or scenarios rather than simply representing the conventional wisdom or the facts as we already know them.” Weiner also ...

Learn more

Cision + Prime Research: Insights That Drive Business Strategies

Recently, I sat down with Kevin Akeroyd, the CEO of Cision®, and Dr. Rainer Mathes, the president and co-founder of Prime Research, to discuss Cision’s recent acquisition of Prime Research and what it means for existing and future customers. In this video, Akeroyd, and Dr. Mathes explain how the marriage of these two companies will bring about one integrated services organization, and one integrated tech platform that does media measurement, monitoring, distribution and database extremely well. If you’re interested in learning more about how Cision and Prime Research will work together to change the future of communications, view the video, or read the transcript below. Chris Lynch: Hello with Cision, and our customers, our employees, our partners, my name is Chris Lynch; ...

Learn more