North America

USA - New York

New York
New York
275 Seventh Ave, Suite 706
New York, NY 10001
P: +1.646.722.3041

USA - Detroit/ Ann Arbor

Ann Arbor / Detroit
Ann Arbor/ Detroit
309 Maynard Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48104
+1 734 913 0348



Frankfurt / Mainz
Kaiserstrasse 22-24
55116 Mainz
+49 6131 2180 0

United Kingdom

58 St. Aldates
Oxford, OX1 1ST
+44 1865 324 911


Badenerstraße 549
8048 Zurich
+41 43 210 97 46

South America


Sao Paulo
Av. Roque Petroni Júnior, 1089
São Paulo, SP Brasil – 04707-900
+55 11 3033 5858

Asia Pacific


Rm.306, Bldg. 2
Lujiazui Software Park No. 100, Lane 91, E'shan Rd. Pudong Shanghai 200127, China
+86 21 6859 2099


Office no. 3, 14th floor German Center
Building No. 9B -DLF Cyber City
Phase-III Gurgaon - INDIA
+91 124 463 6045

The Importance of Measureable Public Relations

Posted On November 22, 2017

by Mark Weiner, PRIME Research

Public Relations benefits directly from the evolving science of marketing. As time progresses, more and more communications investment decision makers recognize PR’s ability to deliver credible and involving messages that are lasting, effective and relatively inexpensive. This combination – lasting, effective and inexpensive leads to a strong return-on-investment. And yet, while communicators know they must contribute a positive ROI (and management demands it) many public relations professionals refuse to assess and measure their public relations output and outcomes, not to mention their ROI.

Just as executives require every other area within the organization to generate and demonstrate a measureable contribution to business goals, executives expect the same from public relations. This means that public relations practitioners must set measurable objectives and deliver results in light of these objectives to ensure that results are clearly understood (even if many top executives don’t fully understand how public relations works). No CEO objects to meeting and beating measureable objectives, especially when performance is gauged over time, versus objectives and in light of competitive performance.

While measurement requires an investment, it need not break the bank. As such, “budget” is a poor excuse for not measuring…you can always do something. In fact, the simplest and least expensive form of public relations evaluations is to simply set measurable objectives and then beat them. Assuming that your objectives are meaningful, measurable and reasonable, public relations research and evaluation may require no budget at all. With measurement as one of the critical challenges facing the public relations profession, why don’t more PR practitioners use research and evaluation to set objectives, develop strategy, and improve performance over time? Professionals express a number of concerns:

  • The costs will outweigh the benefits.

    Sure, research requires a level of investment to undertake a serious and rigorous public relations research program. However, the better question might be, what is the cost of not proving and improving your value when your competitors are proving and improving theirs?
  • What could we possibly find that we didn’t already know?

    There is value in validating what you know because even if your PR victory is obvious to you, it may not be to those funding your programs. Additionally, you never know what else you might learn that is surprising and transformative.
  • This will be a lot of work for senior management: setting research criteria and measurement definitions, selling it, and so on.

    Yes, instituting a research-based public relations program can be time-consuming and should be undertaken at relatively high levels within the organization. However, the definition process is one that provides an immeasurable learning and prioritizing experience, and once the criteria are defined, they won’t change very often.
  • We have only limited control over the results. Why should we be held accountable for things we cannot control?

    While it’s true that certain aspects of the PR process are not completely controllable, much of it is manageable and, as a result, PR departments should be held accountable for delivering quality results that improve over time within that context. If you believe PR can’t be measured it almost ensures you will be watching from the sidelines: marginalized, minimized, and living in limbo.
  • The results will be used against us.

    Using the results as a scorecard is not the primary driver of PR measurement. Instead, research provides the feedback you need to do an even better job. What’s worse is not having any results at all.
  • Research is too complicated.

    It doesn’t have to be complicated. What you need is a basic set of measures that reflect various business objectives and are aligned with your objectives and strategy. The purpose of research and evaluation, after all, is to provide clarity and understanding, not complexity and confusion.
  • It’s too expensive…we can’t afford it.

    Many steps lead to the summit, but all of them begin with a single step: much better to begin simply than to never begin.
  • Make no mistake, communications professionals must ensure — not just measure– PR’s positive return on investment. It’s vital to advocate ROI thinking for PR within your organization as a foundation upon which to consistently communicate your success. And even if one falls short, a commitment to measurement is a commitment to improvement, to develop learning experiences which equip staff and clients with the insight and knowledge they need to understand what public relations ROI means. You cannot change the past but there is still much you can do about the future, and it begins simply…one step a time..

    This essay first appeared in PR News.

    About the Author

    Mark Weiner is the Chief Executive Officer of PRIME Research, LP, an international research-based communications consultancy helping many of the world’s most admired companies and brands to improve their PR-ROI. Mark is the 2017 Chairman of the Institute for Public Relations’ Measurement Commission. Connect with Mark at or follow him on Twitter at @weinermark

    Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInEmail this to someone
    Share this to social

You may also be interested in

What is Wrong with PR?

By Jennifer Sanchis This is probably PR’s greatest irony: PR suffers from bad reputation and image issues. Although the discipline has been institutionalised for years now, the industry is still facing an existential crisis that most practitioners and professional bodies are actively tackling. I wanted to look at the most crucial challenges and misconceptions which, according to me, are at the epicentre of “the PR problem”. PR shouldn’t be another one-way communication channel that organisations use to serve their own interests First published in 1999, the visionary authors of the highly impactful Cluetrain Manifesto were merciless when talking about PR’s credibility issue: “Everyone – including many PR people – senses that something is deeply phony about the profession […]. Take the ...

Learn more


THE IMPACT OF NATIONAL CULTURE ON THE SALIENCE OF CSR DIMENSIONS IN INTERNATIONAL MEDIA COVERAGE Last summer, I spent six weeks doing media research in Ann Arbor, Michigan as the 2017 winner of the Grunig PRIME Research Fellowship. PRIME’s global scope, diverse international team, and its worldwide client base made the company an ideal place for me to be. At the end of my experience, I wrote a paper to remind international PR professionals that concepts habitually referenced on an everyday basis are the products of social construction and, therefore, meanings may vary from one society to another. Specifically, the study concerned corporate social responsibility and its aspects in international media coverage. For the full paper please visit here: Salience of_CSR (PDF). The meaning of ...

Learn more

Mark Weiner Offers Five-Point Plan For “The Datacentric Communicator.”

Mark Weiner, Chief Executive Officer of PRIME Research Americas, posts at the Institute for Public Relations (2/27) under the headline “Advice For The Datacentric Communicator.” Weiner focuses on a five-point plan for “the evolved communicator” to shift from gathering mounds of data to generating actionable insights for their organization. His five suggestions include the understanding that algorithms and technology do some of the heavy lifting on data, but explains how “humans drive understanding, interpretive analysis and strategy.” Weiner also suggests moving from “response-driven research” to “inquiry-based research” that “starts by posing questions, problems or scenarios rather than simply representing the conventional wisdom or the facts as we already know them.” Weiner also ...

Learn more